Links from this article:
Read the article here.

A novel legal issue has arisen: authority over administering the digital assets and accounts of an account holder upon death or disability. This article discusses the UFADAA, a model US statute that aims to make online websites require confirmation by the account holder that they agree to limit their digital assets in accordance with the user agreement. If they do not send the confirmation, the relevant provisions of the user agreement will be void as against public policy. The notice must be by a certified copy of the confirmation form. Delaware is the first state to implement this type of statute. Yahoo and Facebook oppose the statutory scheme. Many providers’ agreements provide that users’ accounts are non-transferable and terminable upon death. Without confirmation, under the model statute these clauses would be void because they limit the account user’s digital assets.

With the advent of ‘the cloud’, more and more digital assets are potentially affected by the non-transferability of user’s licenses.

Read the article here.

Take away:

  • The non-transferability of on-line users’ licences may become an issue for regulation as users age and cloud storage becomes more popular.


–  –  –

This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not create a lawyer-client relationship with the reader. It is not legal advice and should not be regarded as such. Any reliance on the information is solely at the reader’s own risk. is a legal tool geared towards entrepreneurs, early-stage businesses and small businesses alike to help draft legal documents to make businesses more productive. Clausehound offers a $10 per month DIY Legal Library which hosts tens of thousands of legal clauses, contracts, articles, lawyer commentaries and instructional videos. Find where you see this logo.