picture of Rajah

Rajah Lehal

Lack of Time Limit Results in Filing of Arbitration Notice 5 Years After Dispute Arose

August 18, 2015

Links from this article: Read the article here.

A municipality was served with a notice of arbitration disputing the valuation of expropriated land 5 years after the expropriation, because there was no time limit on the ability to file a notice. Parties may wish to consider any time limitations applicable both during and after the termination of the contract.

The City of Woodstock Ontario expropriated land in 2002, was served with a notice of arbitration challenging the valuation of the land expropriated in 2007, and paid a settlement in the matter in 2014. Because of the delays, the interest charges on the increased value exceeded the original valuation. The applicable legislation had no time limit on filing a notice of arbitration.

Read the article here.Take away:

  • Arbitration agreements should specify clear time limits on the service of a notice of arbitration.
Dispute Resolution
Notice of Arbitration
Dispute Resolution

Written by Rajah. Rajah Lehal is Founder and CEO of Clausehound.com. Rajah is a legal technologist and technology lawyer who is, together with the Clausehound team, capturing and sharing lawyer expertise, building deal negotiation libraries, teaching negotiation in classrooms, and automating negotiation with software.