This article posted on our partner site Mondaq.com provides practice pointers for employers executing Employee Intellectual Property Assignment Agreements. The author uses a US Federal Circuit decision that involved an ownership dispute over a patent for a former employee’s invention, to remind businesses to refer directly to an IPAA in an offer of employment (or make the offer of employment contingent upon execution of the IPAA, if possible), use clear language to establish the assignment in an IPAA, use present assignment as opposed to an agreement to assign, and allow only sufficiently described inventions to be excluded under an IPAA. It’s normal for an employer (and business investor) to require that work product developed during work time is owned by the business, and businesses will often represent that this is the case when seeking or taking on investment. This is a good article to read for understanding the boundaries and concerns related to the transfer of employee intellectual property to a company.

 

–  –  –

This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not create a lawyer-client relationship with the reader. It is not legal advice and should not be regarded as such. Any reliance on the information is solely at the reader’s own risk. Clausehound.com is a legal tool geared towards entrepreneurs, early-stage businesses and small businesses alike to help draft legal documents to make businesses more productive. Clausehound offers a $10 per month DIY Legal Library which hosts tens of thousands of legal clauses, contracts, articles, lawyer commentaries and instructional videos. Find Clausehound.com where you see this logo.

What you don't know can hurt you! Subscribe to stay informed.

Sign up now and receive an email when we publish new content.

We will never give away, trade or sell your email address. You can unsubscribe at any time.