Links from this article:
Read the article here.

Multi-tiered dispute resolution clauses may be enforceable if the procedure is certain (eg. specific mediator or center is specified); mandatory language is used (‘shall’ instead of ‘may’); a clear time limit is provided before arbitration is available; duties to act ‘in good faith’ to resolve the dispute are in the context of a clause which is certain in all other aspects noted above.

A 2014 English Commercial Court case upheld ‘friendly discussion’ obligation clauses in a contract because it had the certainty required for an enforceable contract clause. The clause was a ‘multi-tier’ or escalation clause, which provided for different ways of dispute resolution as disputes escalated. The case marked a departure from previous English decisions, but is consistent with other jurisdictions, including Australia.

Read the article here.

Take away:

  • To be enforceable, the four elements of a multi-tiered dispute resolution mechanism must be drafted in mandatory language (‘shall’, ‘must’).

 

–  –  –

This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not create a lawyer-client relationship with the reader. It is not legal advice and should not be regarded as such. Any reliance on the information is solely at the reader’s own risk. Clausehound.com is a legal tool geared towards entrepreneurs, early-stage businesses and small businesses alike to help draft legal documents to make businesses more productive. Clausehound offers a $10 per month DIY Legal Library which hosts tens of thousands of legal clauses, contracts, articles, lawyer commentaries and instructional videos. Find Clausehound.com where you see this logo.

What you don't know can hurt you! Subscribe to stay informed.

Sign up now and receive an email when we publish new content.

We will never give away, trade or sell your email address. You can unsubscribe at any time.